A large focal asymmetry is present in the upper outer left breast. If we had comparisons showing this to be stable for many years, then it could be considered benign. We cannot call it “Probably Benign” until we’ve done the work-up with spot mags and ultrasound, so that answer is incorrect. Jumping to BI-RADS 4 or 5 now is premature.
Here is a spot magnification view:
Now what is your assessment?
Need to perform an ultrasound Normal breast tissue Recommend biopsy
The work-up of this Focal Asymmetry should include an ultrasound at this time
If the ultrasound shows a mass or other suspicious finding then it would be considered BI-RADS 4, Suspicious, and a biopsy should be performed. If the ultrasound is entirely negative, this would fit into a “Probably Benign” category.
This density was called benign, however. This is one year later:
BI-RADS 4, Suspicious. Now this Focal Asymmetry is bigger
Now, if we had called this Probably Benign originally, we probably would have picked up on this growth 6 months sooner. If we had chanced to see some finding on ultrasound perhaps we would have caught it a year ago.
This was called stable. The patient did not come back for 3 more years. Her screening views and subsequent ultrasound:
What do you think the biopsy showed?
Normal breast tissue Fibrocystic change Pseudoangiomatous Stromal Hyperplasia (PASH) DCIS Lobular carcinoma
An ultrasound-guided biopsy yielded ADH. Subsequent lumpectomy showed that this entire lesion was DCIS. No invasive carcinoma was ever found, and nodes were negative.
I would have guessed this was a lobular carcinoma. It was very slow growing, and looked like breast tissue, as lobulars often do. The improtant thing is that you always biopsy developing densities, even if it looks like breast tissue.
To see a case of PASH with a very similar presentation, see related case below.